Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Source:Scottish document NRS, RS38/6 f.241

From Ross Surname Project
Revision as of 03:32, 27 June 2025 by Redheadkelly (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "Hugh Ross, son of David Ross, 1st of Balblair (1680s-1710s)" to "Hugh Ross (1680s-1710s)")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

NRS, RS38/6 f.241 • NRS, RS38/6/241
Sasine to Duff in which Hugh Ross in Balblair is a witness
Originally written in "Scots secretary hand" is not in the list (Breton, Castilian, Cornish, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, Flemish, French, Gaelic, ...) of allowed values for the "Has language" property. 19 August 1701


Document

Printed sources Part. Reg. of Sas. Inverness, Ross, Sutherland & Cromarty, 2nd Series (vol. 6)
National Records of Scotland catalogue
Collection Particular Register of Sasines Etc for Inverness, Ross, Sutherland and Cromarty: Second Series=1661-1869 (RS38/6)
Repository National Records of Scotland
Reference RS38/6 (link to catalog entry)
Title Particular Register of Sasines etc for Inverness, Ross, Sutherland and Cromarty: Second Series
Date 24 Dec 1694-3 Jun 1709
Access status Open
Location On site
Level File
People pages
Related topics
People mentioned • Alexander Duff • Alexander Baille • David Ross • John Ross • Hugh Ross

Timeline

Below is a list of events that are evidenced by this source. They should appear in the 'Timeline' section of articles about people and places involved in the events.

Discussion

Sasine dated 19 August 1701

This is the sasine that Francis Nevile Reid mentions in his entry on Hugh Ross, son of David Ross of Balblair, in the 'Branch of Balblair' section of Rossiana.

  • Hugh, "third son," who was probably father to David, "son to Hugh in Balblair" (Sasine 19th August, 1701).[2]

ScotlandsPeople's description was 'Sasine of 19 August 1701, Hugh Ross in Balblair mentioned as a witness in Sasine to Duff'.

The Scots secretary hand of this document is difficult to read. At the very end of the 3rd page it is possible to make out "David Ross son", and then an unknown word and then one word that looks like Hugh below the end of the sentence. "Hugh Ross in Balblair" then appears clearly at the very beginning of the next page. Just before David Ross at the end of page 3 is another mention of a David Ross followed by something that looks like Royal-something officer of something. Listed next is a John Ross followed by something that looks like 'in ffearn'.

So, was Hugh Ross in Balblair a witness to this sasine along with David, son of Hugh Ross in Balblair?

Hugh, the 3rd son of David of Balblair, was born after 1679. We know this because his older brother, George, was born in 1679.[3] Hugh may have been just old enough to act as a witness himself in 1701, but he was definitely not old enough to be the father of a witness in 1701.

Was there, then, a different Hugh Ross in Balblair in 1701 that would've been older than David of Balblair's 3rd son Hugh?

Source citation

Each of the timeline events displayed above is followed by the reference code for that particular timeline event. This code is not displayed when the timeline event is included in the 'Timeline' section of an article. If an event is discussed within the body of an article, this reference code can be used to cite the source of the timeline event.


Sources

  1. RS38/6 f.241.
  2. Read & Reid 1908, p. 45.
  3. "Rev. George Ross death notice". The Pennsylvania Gazette. Philadelphia: Newspapers.com. 22 Nov 1753. p. 2.